This week I read, “The Horizon” by Cornelius A Van Peursen.” It had too many significant quotes. I did my best to only pull a few:
“And so it is that the horizon is man’s translation into the world. Surrounded by the horizon, the world is reflect by man; reflected on by him. Through the horizon, the world becomes linked to man: it is his world, the human world, the inhabited world. It is not the division of scientific concepts that man becomes aware of his participation in the image of the world but in the unit of lived experience. Man lives in the horizon, Man lives in the horizon, the horizon is himself, the horizon is the world, the horizon reflects back to him the human world, namely, the world as visible in the beam of human reflection”
“The horizon has something intangible, something inviolable about it. Man cannot remove it, not even in thought, nor can he reach it. Every fence can be removed, every limit can be reaching, every frontier can be crossed. The horizon nonetheless, is given as an absolute limit, an impassable boundary. Here again the horizon is shown as not entirely outside. What is outside in the world is accessible.”
“It is nonetheless impossible for man to reach the reflection of his own body. The body cannot overtake its own space. An accessible horizon would destroy bodily space. Man drives the horizon before him.”
“The horizon is beyond reach, and it is precisely for that reason that it ensures the scope of human space. The horizon denotes the zone of human actions. Undoubtedly, the horizon signifies the limit which man cannot reach, but equally it designates the region to which man reaches by means of his sight, his desires, his framed picture of the world. Man allows himself to be invited and intrigued by this horizon which he knows is mysteriously linked to himself.”
“Human beings lay out the path of their life; they discern a direction, they strain toward it, they project themselves. All this is possible only because of the scope of their actions, of their being; because of this scope of which the horizon is the sign. It is likewise in the figurative sense that man knows the horizon and that this horizon opens up to him the sphere of his mind and of his activities. Thee double aspect of the horizon - inaccessible border and space for advancing - is the presupposition of the relation of man: it is the initial condition which exists prior to every human act. The horizon invites and repels at the same time”
“The horizon is neither purely outside nor purely within.”
“But the everyday world, where every mode of thought finds its point of departure, is the grounds of the horizon, the reflected world. The separation between physical and psychical disappears here. It is a case of the human world, material and spiritual at once.”
“The description of the horizon cuts across the dualisms of physical and physical, interior and exterior, literal and figurative, human world and objective world.”
I could go on. But I will stop there. My key realizations were around how the horizon functions, and the significance of the horizon in our presence. This lead me to think of a new framework to analyze spaces -- how connected is the self to the concept, the idea of a horizon. Space can either encourage or sever the connection. I came up with this framework.
Interior = within
Exterior = outer
Boundary = limit, or locator
Infinite, mind self [interior] → body [exterior] space → horizon interior / exterior [mental space]